FG Has Approved Funds for Prosecution of Boko Haram Suspects – Malami

malami 3
Spread the love

The federal government will soon resume the mass prosecution of Boko Haram suspects being held in particular military formations, according to Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami.

President Muhammadu Buhari has approved the release of funds required for the prosecution of the suspects, according to Malami, who was speaking on Monday during a special session to commemorate the start of the federal high court’s new fiscal year.

“I would like to use this opportunity to appreciate the recent special intervention granted by his excellency, President Muhammadu Buhari, for the provision of funds and other logistics for the commencement of the second phase of prosecutions of Boko Haram suspects,” said Malami, who was represented by Beatrice Jedy-Agba, solicitor general of the federation and permanent secretary of the federal ministry of justice.

In 2017, the federal government commenced a trial for persons suspected to be Boko Haram insurgents, with the proceedings taking place at a military base in Niger state.

At the time, the United Nations had raised concerns about human rights issues in relation to the suspects.

During the trial between 2017 and 2018, more than 100 people were convicted and several others were discharged on the grounds of no-case submissions.

Meanwhile, in his address, John Tsoho, chief judge of the federal high court, expressed worry over the number of cases pending before the court, lamenting that some judges have over 1,000 cases in their dockets.

He said the situation was worse at the court’s divisions in Abuja, Lagos, and Port Harcourt.

“We are accustomed to being expected to do more with less or no resources provided at all. While our needs continue to rise, funding doesn’t keep pace,” he said.

“This is notwithstanding the judges’ existing high-volume dockets that present enormous challenges,” he said.

“It is necessary to place on record that the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2022, was enacted without any consultation with the court.

“Also, no support whatsoever was provided to address the increased responsibility. This weighed heavily on the operations of the court.”

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp