Trump lawyers to Supreme Court: Jan. 6 committee 'will not be harmed by delay' | TheHill – The Hill

wp header logo 1373
Spread the love

© 1998-2022 Nexstar Media Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Former President Trumptrumpdonald 070117gettyDonald TrumpTrump lawyers to Supreme Court: Jan. 6 committee ‘will not be harmed by delay’ Two House Democrats announce they won’t seek reelection DiCaprio on climate change: ‘Vote for people that are sane’ MORE’s lawyers told the Supreme Court that the House committee probing the Jan. 6 attack would suffer no harm if the justices delayed the transfer of Trump administration records to congressional investigators.
The bold assertion came amid an ongoing legal clash between Trump and the House panel over whether a trove of records that investigators say would shed light on the deadly Capitol riot is covered by the former president’s assertion of executive privilege.
Trump’s attorneys, in their latest filing, pushed back on the committee’s claim that a protracted legal fight threatens to undermine its work.
“Respondents will not be harmed by delay,” Trump attorneys wrote, referring to the House panel. “Despite their insistence that the investigation is urgent, more than a year has passed since January 6, 2021. Years remain before the next transition of power.” 
“The Committee and the Court have time to make a swift but measured analysis of these important issues and make sure that in the rush to conduct its investigation, the Committee does not do irreparable structural damage in the process,” they added.
The Jan. 6 committee has not established a hard deadline for completing its investigation, but its chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompsonthompsonbennie camillefineBennie Gordon ThompsonTrump lawyers to Supreme Court: Jan. 6 committee ‘will not be harmed by delay’ GOP’s McCarthy has little incentive to work with Jan. 6 panel GOP Rep. Katko, who voted to impeach Trump, won’t run for reelection MORE (D-Miss.), has said the panel hopes to wrap up by early spring.
Trump turned to the Supreme Court last month after lower federal courts in Washington, D.C., rejected his request to halt the National Archives from passing along the records. His attorneys have asked the justices to shield the disputed materials from disclosure while they consider his formal appeal.
In the lower federal courts, judges made quick work in rebuffing Trump’s claims. They zeroed in on President Bidenbidenjoe 081315getty 0Joe BidenMadame Tussauds unveils new Biden and Harris figures US raises concerns about Russian troop movements to Belarus Putin tests a model for invading Ukraine, outwitting Biden’s diplomats MORE’s refusal to invoke executive privilege over Trump-era schedules, call logs, emails and other requested documents. Biden declined to do so after determining that the House panel’s needs for the records exceeded any benefit of keeping them under wraps.
The House panel, for its part, has emphasized the importance of a prompt resolution in the case.
“The Select Committee’s work is of the highest importance and urgency: investigating one of the darkest episodes in our nation’s history, a deadly assault on the United States Capitol and Congress, and an unprecedented disruption of the peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next,” they told the justices last month.
The prospect of a drawn-out Trump court fight has prompted comparisons to the drain-the-clock litigation strategy he wielded as president, where delay tactics were deployed to stymie lawsuits, hamper investigators and fend off subpoenas, with numerous cases against Trump and his administration still hanging in the balance as he left the White House.
View the discussion thread.
The Hill 1625 K Street, NW Suite 900 Washington DC 20006 | 202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax
The contents of this site are © 1998 – 2022 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.


Read Previous

Kanu’s Court Case: High Court Orders FG To Pay Nnamdi Kanu N1bn

Read Next

NEC Proposes ₦302 Per Litre Petrol Price By February

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.