The Senate has reeled out empirical data that guided its decision to make the electronic transmission of election results discretionary rather than mandatory in the ongoing reform of the country’s electoral governance framework.
The upper chamber stated that the decision was based on the realities of the country and not on emotion or sentiment, following consultations and engagements with principal actors in the communications and power sectors, among others.
Senate Majority Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, clarified the position of the upper chamber in a statement issued by his Directorate of Media and Public Affairs in Abuja on Sunday.
According to him, lawmaking comes with significant obligations globally, and the Senate cannot discharge such responsibilities to the detriment of the citizenry.
The Senate had resolved against Clause 60(3) of the Electoral Bill, 2026.
Specifically, the clause stipulates that the presiding officer “shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV) in real time…”
NAN also reports that the Senate subsequently reviewed the contentious clause to further strengthen the electronic transmission of results, in response to public demand, with a caveat that in the event of internet failure, Form EC8A would serve as the primary means of result collation.
Bamidele, however, described Clause 60(3) of the Electoral Bill, 2026 as an initiative that any legislature or parliament globally would ordinarily embrace.
He cited its potential to deepen trust in democratic institutions, especially the National Assembly and INEC.
The Senate leader explained that the Senate considered the implications of Clause 60(3), noting that the country’s communication and power infrastructure would not guarantee the real-time electronic transmission of election results as envisaged by some stakeholders.
Citing data from the Nigerian Communications Commission, Bamidele said Nigeria had achieved about 70 per cent broadband coverage in 2025, while its internet user penetration stood at 44.53 per cent of the population within the same timeframe.
He also cited the Speedtest Global Index, which ranked Nigeria 85th out of 105 countries in mobile network reliability and 129th out of 150 countries in fixed broadband reliability.
He further said: “Based on the Speedtest Global Index, Nigeria’s mobile network reliability was 44.14 megabits per second.
“This is extremely low compared with UAE that has 691.76 mbps; Qatar with 573.53 mbps; Kuwait’s 415.67 mbps; Bahrain’s 303.21 mbps and Bulgaria’s 289.41 mbps. The Index placed Nigeria far below global average.
“Nigeria’s fixed internet broadband rating is quite low by global standards. Out of 150 countries, Nigeria occupied the 129th position with only 33.32 mbps.
“In this rating, Singapore came first with 410.06 mbps, followed by UAE’s 382.35 mbps; France’s 346.25 mbps; Chile’s 348.41 mbps and Hong Kong’s 345.25 mbps.”
The senator also cited official data on the state of power infrastructure, indicating that at least 85 million Nigerians “still lack access to grid electricity. This figure amounts to about 43 per cent of the population.
“This shortfall speaks to the state of our power infrastructure. Even though our generation capacity hovers roughly between 12,000 and 13,500 megawatts, our distribution and transmission capacity is acutely limited.
“As we all know, it can only deliver 4,500 megawatts to households nationwide. But with the Electricity Act, 2025, our power sector will record significant growth from this financial year.”
Given the condition of the country’s communication and power infrastructure, Bamidele expressed doubt over the practicability of real-time electronic transmission of election results, noting that making such a provision mandatory could plunge the country into crisis.
“In democracy, lawmaking sits at the heart of public governance. Indeed, it is its lifeblood that freely flows in the veins of all public institutions.
“It does not respond to mere emotion or sentiment, but to facts, proofs or realities that can define or distort the future of our political system.
“If our law does not capture the realities of the federation, then it is a script for anarchy or a ploy for instability.
“This deduction guided the decision of the Senate to redraft Clause 60(3 & 5) with a caveat, while at the same time addressing the concerns of our people nationwide substantially.
“The caveat, in this case, is the outright deletion of ‘real time’ from the clause so that we will not end up with an electoral governance framework that cannot respond to the stark realities of our fatherland,” he said.
