The National Assembly, on Tuesday, passed the Police Act Amendment Bill, allowing the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to serve out their term as stipulated in their appointment letter.
This development comes after President Bola Tinubu forwarded the bill to the legislature, seeking to amend the IGP’s tenure.
By provisions of this new Bill, the current IGP, Kayode Egbetokun would serve out a full term of four years regardless of the established age-related retirement threshold.
Appointed by President Bola Tinubu in June 2023, Egbetokun is slated to turn 60 years by September 4, 2024. Prior to the amendment, this would have mandated his retirement.
However, with the new Bill, when passed into law, Egbetokun has had his stay as IGP extended by three additional years.
Key Points of the Amendment:
• Previously, the Police Act stipulated a mandatory retirement age of 60 years for IGPs, regardless of their term length.
• The amended Act introduces a new clause that allows IGPs to complete their full term as specified in their appointment letter, even if it extends beyond the age of 60.
• This amendment appears specifically timed to benefit the current IGP, Egbetokun, who was appointed by President Tinubu in June 2023 with a presumed four-year term.
Analysis and Potential Implications:
Proponents might argue that it allows for stability and continuity in leadership, particularly if the IGP is mid-way through implementing reforms or tackling ongoing security challenges.
Critics, however, will raise concerns about a lack of transparency and potential political influence. The amendment’s timing, coinciding with the approaching retirement of a politically-appointed IGP, raises questions about its impartiality. Additionally, some will argue that extending the tenure of a single IGP could stifle opportunities for fresh perspectives and leadership styles within the police force.
The amended Police Act presents a new dynamic for selecting and retaining IGPs in Nigeria. While the stated goal of ensuring stability in police leadership is commendable, the potential for political influence needs careful consideration. Moving forward, it’s crucial to establish clear and objective criteria for determining IGP appointment terms. This enhanced transparency will foster public trust in the police leadership and ensure the effectiveness of this revised system.
