Immigration Roundup: Immigration Reform, SCOTUS Detention & More – The National Law Review

wp header logo 1164
Spread the love

This week, Suzanne Clark, the CEO of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, advocated for the federal government to double the size of legal immigration into the country in order to address widespread worker shortages. During the Chamber’s annual State of American Business address, Ms. Clark also asked for legal relief for undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children, familiarly known as “Dreamers.” Ms. Clark emphasized that “we must create a permanent solution for the ‘Dreamers,’ those young men and women who know no other home and who contribute to their communities, but whose legal status is in limbo.”
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is not the only organization advocating for updates to old immigration laws that have restricted economic growth. Several executives in the hospitality industry sent a letter to both President Biden and Congress stating that “we are struggling to find workers and are shutting down our businesses or cutting back on hours of operation because we can’t find waiters, cooks, housekeepers, managers, and people of all skill levels to hire, despite providing good pay, benefits, bonuses, and other incentives.” Many business leaders support a plan proposed by congressional Democrats to offer lawful status to millions of undocumented immigrants currently residing in the country, as well as significantly reduce backlogs for those applying for immigration relief, many of whom have been waiting several years, or even decades, to gain status in the U.S.
Since the start of the new year, the number of COVID-19 infection rates among detainees at immigration detention centers around the United States have increased by more than 500%, with nearly 1,800 immigrants being monitored or isolated due to confirmed infections. Just two weeks ago, the number of positive infections was a little under 300. The massive surge has put a new spotlight on vaccination rates in prison – only about 1/3 of immigrants who have entered detention over the past six months have been vaccinated, with almost 40% refusing to receive it. A medical adviser to the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), which oversees immigration detention, emphasized that vaccine availability must be combined with education about COVID-19 and the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, over 30,000 detainees have tested positive for COVID-19. The recent uptick may be attributed to the Omicron variant, which has been found to be more easily transmissible than other variants of COVID-19. Attorneys from across the United States have urged U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) to release detainees that have medical conditions, which place them in greater harm of becoming severely ill or dying from COVID-19. According to government records provided in a federal court case, as of December, there were over 5,000 immigrants in ICE detention centers whose health issues or age placed them at higher risk.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for two immigration cases that addressed the rights of detainees to have a bond hearing before an immigration judge following six months of detention. Both immigration cases were brought by immigrants seeking protection in the United States based on their fears of returning to their home countries after being previously deported from the country. The cases present tension between the Immigration and Nationality Act, which permits extended detention by the Department of Homeland Security for those who have been previously removed from the United States, and the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits imprisonment without due process of law and which, as Justice Neil Gorsuch stated during arguments, generally requires “a judicial official to make that physical liberty determination.” A decision from the Court is expected by June of this year, and could impact thousands of individuals in immigration detention every year.
About this Author
William C. Menard practices exclusively in immigration law and deportation defense.
William has represented both individual and corporate clients in all facets of immigration law.  William has appeared on behalf of clients in deportation proceedings before immigration courts throughout the country, including in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.  William has represented numerous clients before both the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Board of Immigration Appeals, and conducted oral arguments before the Second…
 
As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

source

Read Previous

The Legality And Implication Of Mandating The Allotment Of Unissued Shares By Existing Companies Under The Companies Regulations 2021 – Corporate/Commercial Law – Nigeria – Mondaq News Alerts

Read Next

'Varney Bill' aims to provide police with safety tool when no legal action is available – WGME

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.