CAC Constitutes Administrative Proceedings Committee – Corporate/Commercial Law – Nigeria – Mondaq News Alerts

wp header logo 156
Spread the love

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.
The Registrar General of the Corporate Affairs Commission ('CAC'), Alhaji Garba Abubakar, announced at a stakeholder's forum on 13 October 2021 that the Administrative Proceedings Committee ('APC') has been fully constituted to fulfill its statutory mandate. The APC was introduced by Section 851 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020 ('CAMA') as an administrative tribunal for resolution of disputes or grievances arising from the operation of CAMA.
Earlier in the year, the CAC had issued the Companies Regulations 2021 (“the Regulations”) which provides for the set-up and operation of the APC. Read our Newsletter Issue No. 3.2 of March 2021 for our review of the Regulations.
We have outlined below, some key highlights of the APC's statutory mandate and modus operandi as set out in the CAMA and the Regulations:
The APC is empowered to adjudicate on non-criminal disputes arising from the operation of CAMA and, in particular, to resolve issues relating to names of companies, limited liability partnership, limited partnerships, business names and incorporated trustees, shares in private companies, and appointment or removal of directors, partners or trustees;
The constitution of the APC is a welcome development. The comparative ease of commencement of action at the APC and its expected speedy resolution of disputes should make it attractive for parties to refer their disputes to it for resolution in the first instance before appeal to the FHC.
However, it is noteworthy that while Regulation 38 of the Regulations restricts the disputes for adjudication by the APC to only three matters (namely, issues relating to names of corporate entities and other businesses, shares in private companies, and appointment or removal of principal officers), APC is broadly empowered by Section 851(4)(b) to “resolve disputes or grievances arising from the operations of this Act.” The CAC might want to revisit this inconsistency so as not to unduly constrain the APC.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
  © Mondaq® Ltd 1994 – 2021. All Rights Reserved.

Passwords are Case Sensitive

Forgot your password?
Free, unlimited access to more than half a million articles (one-article limit removed) from the diverse perspectives of 5,000 leading law, accountancy and advisory firms
Articles tailored to your interests and optional alerts about important changes
Receive priority invitations to relevant webinars and events
You’ll only need to do it once, and readership information is just for authors and is never sold to third parties.
We need this to enable us to match you with other users from the same organisation. It is also part of the information that we share to our content providers (“Contributors”) who contribute Content for free for your use.

source

Read Previous

Another Big Law Bonus Bonanza Beckons: The Morning Minute – Law.com

Read Next

'It was like the floodgates opened' when women began coming to Kansas for abortions. That may change. – The Topeka Capital-Journal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.